By Tom Ovendale, Principle, and Bob Gruber, Founder, The Rainier Group. Deferred compensation can be a valuable tool in helping CEOs accomplish their employee retention and incentive objectives. Retirement plans, pension plans, and stock-option plans can all aid in making employment opportunities attractive for recruiting. Unfortunately, many deferred compensation plans fail to deliver the desired results both for the company and for their participants. The success or failure of a deferred compensation plan is usually determined at the beginning. This includes the proper assessment of plan objectives and the plan’s design to meet those objectives. Properly defining the core issues often drives whether that plan will be a success or a failure.
There are many reasons to put a deferred compensation plan in place. They usually boil down to one or several of the following:
While it’s tempting to develop a plan to address all these objectives, it’s usually best to focus on a small subset. Trying to develop a plan that is all things to all people is a common path to plan failure.
Once a set of objectives is defined, it’s time to decide what type of plan might best fit. This choice will be heavily dependent on meeting objectives.
Example 1:
Company A has several employees with critical skills in a very competitive employment environment. The company wishes to dissuade these key employees from leaving for other offers. A secondary objective is to incentivize company growth. These objectives suggest certain characteristics that the plan should have:
A mid-term Phantom Stock plan might best fit the circumstances. Participants would have an immediate unvested benefit, which they would forfeit at their departure. There is also incentive for them to grow the company since their eventual benefit and the company’s value tie together.
Example 2:
Company B is interested in providing incentive for key employees to grow the company. A secondary objective is to tie them to the company long term.
These factors suggest a long-term Stock Appreciation Rights plan might be appropriate. Participants would start with no accrued benefit. But, they would receive a percentage of the increase in company value from the point of grant. The participants would vest into full ownership of the benefit over the term of the SAR grants, providing a retention incentive.
Once the type of plan is selected, there are many details to be considered. The objectives will inform each detail:
Companies, owners, and participants can receive meaningful benefits from properly designed deferred compensation plans, but there is significant complexity. CEO’s must rely on consultants and attorneys who travel this road with frequency. For legal guidance, contact the Equinox attorney team at 425-250-0205 or contact@equinoxbusinesslaw.com.
Legal Disclaimer: This article contains general information. Do not view this article as legal advice. Talk with counsel familiar with your unique business needs before taking or refraining from any action.
By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Equinox Business Law Group PLLC, 11130 NE 33rd PL, Suite 120, Bellevue, WA, 98004, US, http://www.equinoxbusinesslaw.com.